Does the Republican Base Skew Old?
by Patrick Ruffini :: May 22nd, 2007 4:01 pmThe lively conversation about the GOP online continues. This time, Eric Frenchman, John McCain’s Internet advertising guru, weighs in.
Eric’s argument basically boils down to: the Republican base skews older, hence they’re less likely to be online. It’s a compelling argument, and one I’ve heard before, but one I’ve got to swat down.
The last two elections in particular have seen a pronounced young voter skew towards the Democrats. Here are the exit polls from 2006 and 2004, Democrats first:
2006
18-29: 60% - 38% Dem (D + 22)
30-44: 53% - 45% Dem (D + 8 )
45-59: 53% - 46% Dem (D + 7)
60+: 50% - 48% Dem (D + 2)
2004
18-29: 54% - 45% Kerry (Kerry + 9)
30-44: 53% - 46% Bush (Bush + 7)
45-59: 51% - 48% Bush (Bush + 3)
60+: 54% - 46% Bush (Bush + 8 )
In these elections, young voters were very much the outliers, supporting Democrats by far more than any other group. And older voters, relatively speaking, did realign with Republicans. In 2000, Bush and Gore were even stevens in every age bracket.
But that assumes that the Internet as a political medium is still dominated by 18-29 year olds — the only age bracket where you could justify a huge Democratic edge based on body count alone. Which runs against every shred of evidence I’ve seen about the online world. I’m 28, and it seems like just about everyone in the blogosphere is older than I am. Quantitatively, the numbers hold up. According to last year’s Blogads survey, the average age of a conservative blog reader worked out to about 47. For liberals, it was 43. Not exactly a huge age gap.
(This hypothesis might validate when you’re talking about MySpace/Facebook, which are composed almost exclusively of 18-29 year-olds. But is anyone willing to argue that these sites now occupy prime position when it comes to online politics? That they’re more important than YouTube or blogs?)
The Demographic snapshot of DailyKos.com readers reveals that while all adult age groups are represented, there is a very large skew toward adults 65 and older. In fact, this age group is nearly four times as likely as the norm to visit the site.
And here’s the full breakdown of DailyKos readers from comScore:
| % Composition of Unique Visitors | Composition Index | |
| Persons - Age | ||
| Persons: 18-34 | 20.7 | 79 |
| Persons: 35-44 | 17.5 | 95 |
| Persons: 45-54 | 27.7 | 137 |
| Persons: 55-64 | 12.2 | 104 |
| Persons: 65+ | 21.9 | 375 |
The age differentials between the parties are nothing compared to the age skew of primary voters and non-voters within the parties. I’ve done voter file analysis before and the median age of a primary voter can range upwards of 55 — in both parties. So, Eric is right to caution a balanced approach online and off — but that advice probably applies about equally to Democrats.
In the Blogads survey, there’s support for another theory often advanced to explain the difference between the online right and left. That Republicans have kids. Here’s a breakdown of household size; over 100% indicates a greater liberal propensity in that group.
| 1 | 143.4% |
| 2 | 109.5% |
| 3 | 102.2% |
| 4 | 82.6% |
| 5 | 49.7% |
| 6 | 33.1% |
| 7 | 28.4% |
| 8+ | 34.6% |
These are fairly staggering numbers. Liberals are fully 40% more likely to live by themselves. Conservatives are twice as likely to have 3 kids, and 3 times as likely to have 4 kids or more.
Intuitively, I think that has a lot more to do with levels of activism than age. After all, retired people should have a lot of time on their hands and are outsized participants in other aspects of the political process. But someone with kids (and presumably a steady job to support those kids) is a lot less likely to have time to refresh Daily Kos. My household size recently exploded from 2 to 4, and I can safely say that my blogging output has gone down. Paging Henry: I want the next Blogads survey (probably in 2008) to break down how much time conservatives and liberals spend online in a week. And I want a breakdown of activism levels by household size (doable this year).
Ultimately, I not only believe the age analysis is inaccurate. I think it’s poisonous. To claim that the Internet is primarily a venue for young people cheapens it. The Internet is more mainstream than that. Yes, teen texting fiends are the most voracious users, but by and large, they’re not interested in politics yet. There’s another audience of people who do go online and do vote and that’s who you should be focused on. Remember, that when we’re talking about online politicos, 35 is still young. The average online citizen is 45. It’s in that late 30’s, early 40’s age range that online news consumption hits its sweet spot. And that demographic was the second most Republican group in the last Presidential election.
Tagged: demographics 
online politics
Comments (4) 
Trackbacks (0) 
del.icio.us 
digg it 
subscribe
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Patrick,
Great blog, I really enjoy reading your perspective on what we are doing as Republicans to stay ahead of the technolgoical curve. Your article resonates… I struggle to stay as active as I would like outside of my other responsibilities as I have a five year old and a three year old at home that just went to bed an hour ago!
I’ve long thought that the soon to be retiring boomer population, to the degree that we are able to communicate with them and harness their talent and time as it is available will be the key to our grassroots success looking forward over the next decade.
Keep up the great work! I’m a Philly-area native as well (my earliest Philly memory was the MOVE disaster). I started out as an intern for Jon Fox in Congress.
FYI - if you didn’t know Edwards’ online guy is also a Philly native/GWU alumni.
Jeez, I’m 47. Now I have an excuse for Reagan worship, unlike a lot of folks who were watching Sesame Street when I was watching the McLaughlin Group
the reasons the Democratic Party skews younger is that the 20-29 y/o group is much less white that the older groups. The Republicans are failing to attrach younger voters because younger voters are much more likely to be black, Hispanic, or Asian and those are three groups that just refuse to support Republicans.
If you project out the current school age children into middle age, there is little chance that the Republicans will remain as a relevent political party. The Republicans face the prospect of either getting huge numbers of blacks and hispanic to vote Republica or they have to win over 2/3’s of the white voters. Since neither appears remotely possible, it is easy to see how national politics in the future will begin to resemble current pay politics in California or Maryland.
Nice response. However, when people say that Republicans are losing online they often point to MySpace, YouTube, and Facebook stats as referenced in that article. Those sites skew younger as the links in my post show courtesy of Quantcast. The final answer would be voting profiles of those sites, but sadly I couldn’t find them. Cheers!!
Eric