Ron Paul Has Won
by Patrick Ruffini :: November 26th, 2007 10:30 amHe won’t win the nomination. He won’t win any primaries. But for Ron Paul’s quixotic bid for the White House, it’s “Mission Accomplished.”
Take a look at this from Sunday’s Washington Post. Not just the article but the killer packaging:
In the past few months, Ron Paul has dramatically raised the profile of libertarianism inside the Republican Party. My small-l libertarian friends seem more comfortable describing themselves as such, even though they’ll go out of their way to disassociate themselves from Ron Paul and the big-L kind.
Libertarianism in the GOP took a big hit on 9/11, and it’s slowly coming back, with Ron Paul as the catalyst. Its underlying ideals still have appeal well beyond the cramped confines of the LP. If it’s possible to be known as a pro-life, pro-war, pro-wiretapping libertarian, then sign me up. Markos too brands himself a “libertarian Democrat,” though he’s never read Hayek and supports big government social programs.
Some campaigns can win big without ever coming close to winning an actual contest. Pat Robertson’s 1988 campaign signaled that Christian Conservatives had arrived in the GOP. Ron Paul is doing the same for libertarians. This is not a counterweight to the religious right per se, since Paul is identified as pro-life, but it does potentially open up a new army of activists on the right not primarily motivated by social/moral issues.
Not every losing single-issue candidate succeeds like this. Immigration-restrictionists still lack an outlet in the GOP, thanks to Tom Tancredo’s embarrassing tone-deafness as a candidate. Sam Brownback’s campaign had hoped to galvanize single-issue pro-lifers, but was hobbled by his dry persona. Duncan Hunter looks mostly like a campaign for Secretary of Defense.
Assuming Paul loses, where does small-l libertarianism go from here? His movement already did the smart thing by making peace with social conservatism. Libertarianism is no longer aligned with libertine stances on abortion and gay rights.
To become the ascendant ideology within the GOP, I suspect they’ll have to find a way to do the same thing on national security. The war on terror writ large is the one big thing social and economic conservatives agree on, and Ron Paul is vocally aligned against both.
Mainstream Republican libertarians might be gung-ho for Paul’s small-government idealism, they might adopt Glenn Reynoldsish skepticism of the homeland security bureaucracy, and even John McCain has lately made a thing of ripping the military-industrial complex, but there is no way — I repeat NO WAY — they will embrace Ron Paul if he continues to blame America for 9/11 and imply that America is acting illegally in defending itself around the globe. Even if they aren’t the biggest fans of the war, most people that are available for Ron Paul on the right are by temperament patriotic and will never vote for someone who sounds like Noam Chomsky.
As someone who routinely called myself a libertarian prior to 9/11, here’s how I would square the circle: Absolute freedom within our borders, for our own citizens; eternal vigilance and (when necessary) ruthlessness abroad. For libertarian ideals to survive, they must be relentlessly defended against the likes of Islamic extremists. Take a look at Andrew Sullivan’s writing right after 9/11 to see this ideal in its purest form; far from a religious crusade, ours was a war for secularism, tolerance, and free societies where gays don’t get stoned to death.
The key principle is one of reciprocity. If you behave peacefully and embrace the norms of a libertarian society, we leave you alone. If you seek to destroy a free society, we will destroy you.
If they’re serious about defending their ideals and seeing to it that libertarianism survives more than a generation in actual practice, I don’t see any reason why libertarians couldn’t embrace a more conservative positioning on national security.
WordPress database error: [Can't open file: 'prwp_comments.MYD'. (errno: 144)] WordPress database error: [Can't open file: 'prwp_comments.MYD'. (errno: 144)] WordPress database error: [Can't open file: 'prwp_comments.MYD'. (errno: 144)] WordPress database error: [Can't open file: 'prwp_comments.MYD'. (errno: 144)] WordPress database error: [Can't open file: 'prwp_comments.MYD'. (errno: 144)] WordPress database error: [Can't open file: 'prwp_comments.MYD'. (errno: 144)]
Tagged: libertarianism 
ron paul
Comments (
SELECT ID, COUNT( comment_ID ) AS ccount
FROM prwp_posts
LEFT JOIN prwp_comments ON ( comment_post_ID = ID AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_type='')
WHERE post_status = 'publish' AND ID IN (522)
GROUP BY ID
SELECT ID, COUNT( comment_ID ) AS ccount
FROM prwp_posts
LEFT JOIN prwp_comments ON ( comment_post_ID = ID AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_type='pingback')
WHERE post_status = 'publish' AND ID IN (522)
GROUP BY ID
SELECT ID, COUNT( comment_ID ) AS ccount
FROM prwp_posts
LEFT JOIN prwp_comments ON ( comment_post_ID = ID AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_type='trackback')
WHERE post_status = 'publish' AND ID IN (522)
GROUP BY ID
Trackbacks (
SELECT ID, COUNT( comment_ID ) AS ccount
FROM prwp_posts
LEFT JOIN prwp_comments ON ( comment_post_ID = ID AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_type='')
WHERE post_status = 'publish' AND ID IN (522)
GROUP BY ID
SELECT ID, COUNT( comment_ID ) AS ccount
FROM prwp_posts
LEFT JOIN prwp_comments ON ( comment_post_ID = ID AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_type='pingback')
WHERE post_status = 'publish' AND ID IN (522)
GROUP BY ID
SELECT ID, COUNT( comment_ID ) AS ccount
FROM prwp_posts
LEFT JOIN prwp_comments ON ( comment_post_ID = ID AND comment_approved = '1' AND comment_type='trackback')
WHERE post_status = 'publish' AND ID IN (522)
GROUP BY ID
del.icio.us 
digg it 
subscribe
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
WordPress database error: [Can't open file: 'prwp_comments.MYD'. (errno: 144)]
SELECT * FROM prwp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = '522' AND comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date
