links for 2008-01-19
by Patrick Ruffini :: January 19th, 2008 7:18 am-
A good Rudy ad
![]()
Comments (0)
Trackbacks (0)
del.icio.us
digg it
subscribe
Vote for Huckabee
by Patrick Ruffini :: January 18th, 2008 4:01 pm (Not an endorsement.)
The final South Carolina numbers are showing McCain with a slight edge, with Fox pegging him at +7, Zogby at +7, and InsiderAdvantage at a tie. The RCP average is McCain +4.2.
The poll also shows Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson at 26-28 percent of the vote between them, with each holding about 13 percent. Between them, conservative candidates who are not John McCain are polling at 50 percent of the vote in the Palmetto State to McCain’s 26 percent.
I think it’s time to have a serious discussion about Romney and Thompson supporters switching to Huckabee to prevent McCain from getting momentum.
There is a serious chance that the race could effectively end with a McCain victory in SC, in the same way the Dem race probably ended with New Hampshire and past Republican races ended in the same state. With a South Carolina victory, McCain would have a slight advantage going into Florida. Winning Florida and effectively taking Rudy out of the race would then let him run the tables in the big Feb. 5 blue states, starting with California, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, etc. not to mention all the red states where he is tied with Mike Huckabee, whom he will have beaten on his home turf.
You may hate Mike Huckabee. You may even dislike him more than John McCain. But without him winning tomorrow night, your guy’s path to victory becomes a whole lot harder.
Letting Huckabee win isn’t as dangerous as letting McCain win. Huckabee victories aren’t convertible to momentum in the same way McCain ones are (just look at the post-IA and NH bounces). He is running below his poll numbers on Intrade for a reason, and that’s because he has a hard ceiling of support. That doesn’t mean he couldn’t win in Minneapolis in a McGovern-like squeaker, but the possibility is remote.
If you’re a Romney or a Rudy guy, this is a relative no-brainer. This will be tougher for FredHeads, since their guy has made a stand in the state. But with less than 24 hours to go, and Fred running no better than a weak third, it is probably time to face facts. It’s too bad, because conservatives deserve Fred Thompson as a choice, but it just doesn’t seem to be happening.
So if you live in South Carolina, vote for Mike Huckabee so that the rest of the country has a chance to vote for your guy on January 29th and February 5th.
![]()
Comments (6)
Trackbacks (0)
del.icio.us
digg it
subscribe
links for 2008-01-18
by Patrick Ruffini :: January 18th, 2008 7:18 am-
Commenter: “The other candidates on both sides have to score a KO to win the race. Only Clinton and Romney can win on points.”
-
Ouch.
-
Why is it that most primary candidates refuse to run sustained, intense negative campaigns? The answer is that everybody is basically on the same side.
-
Is online behavior a better predictor of votes?
![]()
Comments (0)
Trackbacks (0)
del.icio.us
digg it
subscribe
The Single State Strategy
by Patrick Ruffini :: January 18th, 2008 12:12 amAmidst the chaos that is the GOP race right now, it’s interesting to see one pattern repeating itself over and over again: candidates with single-state strategies beating candidates with multiple-state strategies.
Huckabee emphasized Iowa over New Hampshire and he won.
Romney was the only one to play in Wyoming and he won.
McCain emphasized New Hampshire over Iowa and he won.
Romney emphasized Michigan over South Carolina and he won.
Romney is the only one campaigning in Nevada, and ARG had him up 7 today and a Las Vegas Review-Journal poll to be released tomorrow has him up 15 (note that there is a heavy Mormon population in NV).
The converse is also true:
Romney ran a multi-state campaign in Iowa and New Hampshire and lost.
McCain ran a multi-state campaign in Michigan and South Carolina, and lost Michigan.
The trend also seems to apply on a micro-level to Rudy and Fred. We see how abysmally Rudy and Fred perform when they barely set foot in a state, despite polling in the mid-teens nationally. Where he has campaigned, Fred has placed or polled between 10% and 15%. Where he hasn’t, he’s barely ahead of Duncan Hunter.
We also see this with Rudy, though of course we don’t have results for a state where he’s campaigned in earnest for comparison purposes. But looking ahead, Florida is probably his #1 or #2 state in the country right now because he’s campaigned there — though it is no better than a tie.
Are early state voters such zealous guardians of their local prerogatives that 60-80% of support a candidate would have otherwise gotten simply peels away once the candidate leaves? Does local earned media matter that much? Or do voters just gravitate towards the two top horses in any horserace — regardless of what national polls or other states may say?
![]()
Comments (1)
Trackbacks (0)
del.icio.us
digg it
subscribe
links for 2008-01-17
by Patrick Ruffini :: January 17th, 2008 7:19 am-
Yeah, maybe it looks mean, but this is what you do if you want to win. Politics isn’t about making friends.
-
Geaux Bobby J!
-
Good use of YouTube
-
This is a shakedown pure and simple.
-
Ron Paul’s primary challenger. Make sure to donate a few.
![]()
Comments (0)
Trackbacks (0)
del.icio.us
digg it
subscribe
links for 2008-01-16
by Patrick Ruffini :: January 16th, 2008 7:18 am-
McCain: “I think the Democratic Party is a fine party, and I have no problems with it, in their views and their philosophy.”
-
give me a break
![]()
Comments (0)
Trackbacks (0)
del.icio.us
digg it
subscribe
McCain’s Michigan Letdown
by Patrick Ruffini :: January 15th, 2008 11:57 pmMitt gets his win, Hugh gets his night, and we begin to see what mainline conservative opposition to McCain can look like in later primaries.
In two states in a row, John McCain underperformed 2000 — when he was eventually drubbed by 20 points nationally. Mitt Romney may have run as the “Governor of Michigan” but McCain was dubbed the “Governor of New Hampshire.” Romney won his state by 9, McCain won his by 5. Also, in both New Hampshire and Michigan, McCain has not closed well. He finished no better than the final polls in New Hampshire, and lost by 9 in Michigan when the final RCP average showed 2.7.
Also, as in New Hampshire, McCain did not attain blowout margins among independents and Democrats and their share of the vote plummeted. McCain is no longer the insurgent, but the putative frontrunner and mischief makers from the other side have little incentive to cross over to support him. This cushion that kept him alive in 2000 is no longer there for him in 2008. Though there are some indications he’s making up for it in Republican support, that trend was more apparent in New Hampshire than Michigan.
Did Romney family nostalgia play a role? Not among those voters old enough to remember George Romney. McCain won voters over 65 by 39-38%.
Other highlights of Romney’s impressive, broad-based win:
- Romney won conservatives 41-23%, with 20% for Huckabee.
- Romney won Republicans 41-27%.
- Romney won Evangelicals 34-29% for Huckabee. McCain took just 23%.
- Romney won with those satisfied with President Bush 45-24%. Yes, Republicans are split 50-50 on this, but it’s easier to message around support for the party’s leader rather than opposition to him. McCain always has to tread gingerly on this to avoid angering what institutional support he has.
- Romney’s margins were strongest in the Detroit suburbs, with 46% of the vote in Oakland & Macomb Counties.
And once again, McCain shows us exactly what the Republican coalition does not look like, and why it may be difficult to harmonize McCain’s base with what he needs to do to win:
- McCain won Democrats 41-33%.
- McCain won pro-choice voters 39-35%.
- He won among those who never attend church by 11 points — 39-28.
- The “architect of the surge” won with Iraq war disapprovers 36-29.
It’s unclear what this means at the end of the day, and if McCain’s national (and South Carolina) momentum now dissipates. There was a great deal of hoopla over Michigan in 2000, with a great deal of talk then about Mac being Back after a bruising South Carolina defeat a few nights before. But it wasn’t to be. South Carolina was what mattered.
Since the media has mythologized South Carolina so, will we back to square one if McCain prevails against an opposition that increasingly looks like the Clampitts? Any two of Huckabee, Romney, and Thompson could easily gang up on McCain to take him out, but they are divided almost evenly, it’s unclear who has real momentum, and Romney had abandoned the state (to get the Michigan win). Will tonight give him enough traction to be the chief conservative rival? Even if it could, I’m not sure Romney wants a direct confrontation with McCain in SC. He has not won on Southern accented ground before, and has done no better than hold his own among Evangelicals, though we did see McCain run well behind with them tonight, so maybe that’s grounds for reconsidering.
If not Romney, who? Huckabee? That’s not ideal for Romney, because it locks a lot of conservative votes into an appealing anti-Romney candidate with vote getting potential. In an ideal world (for Romney), a bunch of support coalesces around FDT, as he seems to be the most harmless going down the stretch (and he ends this Huckabee nonsense), but he’d have to jump through the most hoops in the next few days.
So, I’m not willing to proclaim the end of McCain just yet. However, home state ties notwithstanding, Romney has got to be liking what these exit poll internals are showing as we move from retail to wholesale states. In Michigan, Romney’s vote pattern closely matched that of President Bush throughout the 2000 primary season. If he can get enough of a bounce to get voters elsewhere to notice, he might still have a shot.
![]()
Comments (2)
Trackbacks (0)
del.icio.us
digg it
subscribe
links for 2008-01-15
by Patrick Ruffini :: January 15th, 2008 7:20 am-
Yeah.
-
How could McCain lose when he has three other campaigns doing his work for him?
-
Old but good. H/T: Flap.
![]()
Comments (0)
Trackbacks (0)
del.icio.us
digg it
subscribe
links for 2008-01-14
by Patrick Ruffini :: January 14th, 2008 7:19 am-
Once again, Romney in metro areas, McCain in rural areas.
-
A good tonic for all of you who think everything is planned…
![]()
Comments (0)
Trackbacks (0)
del.icio.us
digg it
subscribe
McCain’s National Lead
by Patrick Ruffini :: January 14th, 2008 5:20 amSo much for Iowa and New Hampshire not mattering this year.
McCain 33
Huckabee 18
Giuliani 10
Romney 8
Thompson 8
Paul 3
McCain 28
Huckabee 20
Romney 19
Giuliani 15
Thompson 8
Paul 5
Rudy has been trying sell people on the idea that is a “unique” year. The only thing that’s unique about it is that voters nationally waited for Iowa & New Hampshire to winnow the field for them. This is exactly what happened in 2004 for the Democrats.
In primaries, people vote for the candidate in their comfort zone with a real chance to win.
In the early stages, when people actually weighed the different alternatives and came to wildly disparate conclusions. You’d see blog comment threads with people taking very seriously the decision between Fred, Rudy, McCain, etc. I can guarantee you that none of that is happening now. People are defaulting to their third and fourth choice candidates when they can see that their top choices have no prayer. Voters are very strategic this way.
Take a look at this shift:
WHO IS MOST ELECTABLE IN NOVEMBER?
(Among Republican Primary Voters)
Now 12/07
McCain 41% 7%
Huckabee 14 13
Giuliani 12 43
Romney 9 18
Thompson 3 3
D/K 18 13
Why this dramatic movement? Because McCain has won, and in politics, you win by winning not retreating. Winning or exceeding expectations in primaries is seen as a proxy for victory in the fall. This is why Kerry was seen as the most “electable” when Edwards was in point of fact the most electable. Ditto for Bush-McCain in ‘00.
McCain is now aggregating two-thirds to three-quarters of the McCain-Rudy bloc, inverting polling from most of the year. Either’s path to the nomination was always going to mean disqualifying the other. McCain is doing it.
On the conservative side, we see a still fragmented field with a Huckabee ceiling in the low twenties. Even with momentum, Huck has trouble breaking 15% anywhere north of the Mason-Dixon. This has greatly complicated Mitt Romney’s strategy of becoming the conservative default by forging an alliance between the establishment and social conservatives.
McCain is sitting pretty right now because the “conservative alternative” represents maybe half the movement. This is not a diss on social conservatives taking their place as leaders in the party. In fact, the Huck strategy is working out better than the Rudy strategy of trying to do it just with economic conservatives. Never before has there been a clearer need for a candidate authentically conservative on both social and economic issues. The trouble is that we don’t have a candidate like that who satisfies the “who can win” (in the primary) requirement right now.
What would it take for McCain to lose this lead? A lot more than it would have taken a week ago. Team Romney has taken solace in a series of Michigan polls showing them ahead. The problem is that Michigan will not inspire the wall-to-wall coverage of IA/NH, so there’s not as big a bounce to be had. Knocking McCain back down to earth would probably take a series of disappointing second or thirds in Michigan, in South Carolina, and in Florida. And even then, it will be at the hands of different winners, so it’s not clear who get momentum at his expense.



















