Warning: main(header.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/site331/fst/var/www/html/rants/001169.php on line 2

Warning: main(header.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/site331/fst/var/www/html/rants/001169.php on line 2

Warning: main(): Failed opening 'header.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/php/includes:/usr/share/php:/usr/share/pear') in /home/virtual/site331/fst/var/www/html/rants/001169.php on line 2


<< Last Entry - Main Page - Next Entry >>

[04.29.03] The Calendar Numerous people have sliced and diced the various aspects of the Democratic presidential race — the money chase, the war issue, the national polls, the early primary states — but not enough attention has been paid to the dynamics the calendar itself will play. By "the calendar," I mean the early primary schedule. In the weeks between Iowa and Super Tuesday, it'll have a formative (more accurately, a transformative) impact, shaping who gets the Big Mo heading into the Super Tuesday. Beyond Iowa and New Hampshire, who is likely to do well in which states (and on which dates)? Now that the Calender's almost solidified, here's my take:

January 19, 2004
Iowa - Gephardt, Kerry, Dean

January 27
New Hampshire - Kerry, Dean

What January 28 looks like if Dean scores an upset in one or both: With a New Hampshire victory, he'll have KO'd Kerry, and possibly Gephardt if he wins Iowa, although that'll be harder to do. What is clear is that by setting the bar so high in New Hampshire, Kerry has walked into a big trap. The Granite State is looking more and more like single-elimination between Kerry and Dean. Both badly need a win because as the Calendar will show, liberals won't be back in the driver's seat until Super Tuesday. There's no low-hanging fruit for either of them until then, especially Dean. Since Dean likely won't follow up with wins in the more conservative February 3 states, the best he can hope for is a Lieberman-Edwards-Gephardt stalemate. With that, and with Kerry out of the picture, he could win Cali and New York and end it. ...And if Dean doesn't win? He's screwed. Moreover, an indecisive or expected result in IA/NH (Gephardt/Kerry) that doesn't contribute much to either's momentum could leave room for Lieberman (or Edwards) to make a move in the first day of serious multistate competition on February 3.

February 3, NASCAR/Right-to-Work Tuesday
AZ - Lieberman, Edwards, Hart?
DE - Lieberman, Kerry
MO - Gephardt
NM - Lieberman, Hart?
OK - Lieberman, Edwards
SC - Edwards, Gephardt, Lieberman

What February 4 looks like if Lieberman is still in the race... It's easy to see why Lieberman is focusing on this date, and especially in Arizona. As you can see, he rates five top-tier mentions to three for Edwards, two for Gephardt, and two for Hart. Lieberman does best in national polls and among groups who aren't particularly interested in the race yet, and these states give him a chance to prove his mettle outside the hyper-organized Iowa and New Hampshire. As the only Western candidate, Hart has to opportunity to become the Freddy Picker candidate by generating boomlets in neighboring Arizona and New Mexico. Obviously, Edwards is in pretty serious trouble if he doesn't win South Carolina. ...and if Lieberman has already collapsed or dropped out... then that becomes the opening for Edwards. I see him as the most likely beneficiary because he appeals to the same soft suburbanite constituency as Lieberman, and the February 3 states tend to be fast-growing sunbelt states. Interestingly, Gephardt's constituency is the most conservative (moreso than Lieberman's), consisting largely of urban ethnics, unions, and seniors. But February 3 is weighted toward right-to-work states, which doesn't help him.

February 7
MI - Gephardt, Lieberman
WA - Kerry, Dean

This date should provide some good mini-intrigue on both the Left and Labor fronts. Michigan in particular will test whether Gephardt has legs outside Iowa and Missouri, providing the first real breakthrough opportunity if he's still in the middle of the pack.

February 8
ME - Kerry, Dean

February 10
DC - Sharpton, Dean
VA - Lieberman, Edwards

Increasingly a bellwether, the Old Dominion primary should prove an interesting test of who rules in Virginia Democratic politics: Northern Virginia or the rest of the state? One thing's for sure: Joe Lieberman won't be doing any events with his buddy Jim Moran. Watch who Mark Warner endorses.

February 17
WI - Gephardt

February 24
UT - Lieberman, Hart?

March 2
CA - Lieberman, Kerry
CT - Lieberman
GA - Edwards
HI - Kerry, Dean, Hart?
MD - Lieberman, Kerry
MA - Kerry
MN - Gephardt, Dean
NY - Lieberman, Kerry
OH - Gephardt, Kerry, Lieberman
TX - Edwards, Lieberman
VT - Dean

Obviously, this is where the analysis breaks down somewhat because the early calls here depend so much on the plethora of variables that play out before. Under the Dean surge/Lieberman out/Kerry wounded permutation, Dean could capture New York and California by default and be well on his way to the nomination. How much opposition he has would depends on how strong a stand Gephardt makes in the Rust Belt, or Edwards makes in the South. This scenario also makes sense if you believe this race is one of regional brackets and that only one candidate can emerge from the East (with Gary Hart lurking undisturbed in the West bracket). Under the Kerry still there/Dean hurting/Lieberman ascendant permutation, March 2 becomes an opportunity for Kerry to regain some lost ground to Lieberman, centering around a must-win in California and to a lesser extent, a knockout punch in the Lieberman-friendly Empire State. If it's Kerry there/Dean institutionalized/Edwards climbing expect Edwards to be spending some long nights in the Dallas offices of Baron & Budd, because Texas is the only delegate-rich show of strength that'll impress at that point. I could go on and on, but the night is only so long.

Of course, this all assumes that we'll have the same multipolar race we've got today. If a clear frontrunner emerges, it'll then be a game of winnowing the most plausible national challenger. But if there isn't a clear frontrunner, it's doubtful one will decisively emerge in the relatively slow-burn period between January 27 and March 2. With a regionally varied cast of electorates, voters will take their regional and cultural cues and cast their votes accordingly. Even the relatively unipolar 2000 primary campaigns lingered on during February, and the same should happen again, making for a very interesting month.

Permalink Comments (7) Pings (0) Donate Election Analysis

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Great post. Interesting analysis. I agree with much of it but would add two details. First, I think we can assume that Mark Warner will endorse Edwards. Edwards worked hard on Warner's behaf in his VA race. The two are close, and share some staffers. That could be enough to give Edwards VA. Second, even though Lieberman polls well now, if you put your ear to the ground among Democratic activists, Lieberman is a non-starter. Given his tepid fundraising, it is not unreasonable to wonder if he could last long enough for the race to reach the conservative state primaries.

Also, what about Bob Graham. He seems rusty. Is he just running for veep?

Posted by: Sue Talent at April 30, 2003 12:09:47 AM

Ramesh Ponorru can read the calendar too - or maybe just this blog!

Posted by: blaster at April 30, 2003 01:18:48 PM

ARG conducted a poll over the past six days in South Carolina, and they show Lieberman way out front:

WH '04 Dem Primary Matchup

Joe Lieberman 19%
Dick Gephardt 9
John Kerry 8
John Edwards 7
Al Sharpton 3
Bob Graham 2
Howard Dean 2
Carol Moseley Braun 1
Dennis Kucinich -

Posted by: Jamie at April 30, 2003 05:17:54 PM

For the record, I believe that Ramesh is completely innocent. His post time on NRO is 7:45 AM, giving him little over eight hours to find this post and compose his own thoughts. He's fully capable of it, but it's unlikely.

The most likely thesis is that he just read the Hotline yesterday, like me.

Posted by: Patrick Ruffini at April 30, 2003 08:55:02 PM

I'm still thinking it'll be Dean as the Democrats drive off the cliff in 2004:

Anyone have any thoughts about the possibility of it being an open convention? Hillary from the floor?

Posted by: Mark Noonan at April 30, 2003 09:56:19 PM

Nice writeup.
It's awful early to try and figure out what's going on. Also seeing conflicting evidence (i.e. Lieberman leads poll but anecdotal says he's doing poorly, anecdotal saying Gephardt doing well/poorly).
I think it's Bush's to lose (which he may do) so I'll wait until the primaries to get an idea of what Dem gets the honor of going against Bush.
And as Mark notes there is the Hillary issue hanging out there.

Posted by: AWW at May 1, 2003 08:50:35 AM

This race is getting more and more difficult to handicap due to the variety of permutations that Patrick has so aptly laid out. I was looking at the results of past primaries the other day in an attempt to find general trends and I noticed how often the victor in NH fails to garner the nomination. We all remember Presidents McCain and Buchanan, right? The most similiar races to 2004 in recent history, those of 1964 and 1972, have followed a couple of trends. 1) The winner in NH does not get the nomination and 2) the eventual nominee is a fringe candidate who loses big time. Neither Henry Cabot Lodge ('64) nor Hubert Humphrey ('72) could capture the nomination of their respective parties those years even though each of them would have presented a far greater challenge to the incumbent at the time. That's why I don't think Lieberman or Edwards can win. That leaves Kerry, Dean, and Gephardt. The only way Gephardt wins is if the thing goes to the convention and the "superdelegates" are forced to decide between 2 or 3 of these guys. From what I understand, these delegates may be loyal to Gephardt due to his former position as House Democratic leader. I think the most likely nominee is Kerry with Dean a close second.

Would Kerry be a Democratic Barry Goldwater? Probably. We haven't elected a President from the northeast since 1960. Dean would be more like a George McGovern. Either way, Bush takes all of the states he won last time plus the entire Midwest (as a Michigan native, I would be genuinely surprised if any of those states is even close this time around, though Illinois may still be in play in a closer race). That gives Bush exactly 400 electoral votes even without the West Coast or the Northeast. If he can win NY and/or CA, it's a Reagan style victory.

HRC will not run in 2004. She's too smart for that. She realizes that 2008 will be much easier, especially with a nom-incumbent running on the Republican side who will probably suffer from Bush fatigue just as much as he or she benefits from Bush success. Moreover, if Pataki or Giuliani jump into the 2004 Senate race and take out Schumer, and if HRC takes advantage of the 2006 off-year election and coasts to a second term in the Senate, she will be the senior senator from NY and the front runner for the Democratic nomination. The GOP, meanwhile, will have no front runner, though I still suspect a Jeb Bush/Bill Frist ticket. A 2008 race against Jeb or some divisive northeastern Republican (Pataki, Rudy, Mitt, Ridge) would give HRC a reasonable shot at victory.

Posted by: Dave at May 2, 2003 12:55:37 PM

Post a comment










Remember personal info?






Y'all! MT hears you — just click once to see your comment posted.


Syndicate this Site: XML or RDF

Powered by Movable Type 2.63

E-mail me -at- patrickruffini.com

LATEST RANTS
ALL ARCHIVES

Warning: main(archivelist.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/site331/fst/var/www/html/rants/001169.php on line 296

Warning: main(archivelist.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/site331/fst/var/www/html/rants/001169.php on line 296

Warning: main(): Failed opening 'archivelist.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/php/includes:/usr/share/php:/usr/share/pear') in /home/virtual/site331/fst/var/www/html/rants/001169.php on line 296
SEPTEMBER 11 - 30, 2001
SEPTEMBER 1 - 11, 2001
AUGUST 16 - 31, 2001
AUGUST 1 - 15, 2001
JULY 16 - 31, 2001
JULY 9 - 15, 2001




Warning: main(footer.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/site331/fst/var/www/html/rants/001169.php on line 333

Warning: main(footer.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/site331/fst/var/www/html/rants/001169.php on line 333

Warning: main(): Failed opening 'footer.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/php/includes:/usr/share/php:/usr/share/pear') in /home/virtual/site331/fst/var/www/html/rants/001169.php on line 333