The Intersection

The Intersection

Against p(doom)

Real safety issues should be addressed, but we all need to relax a bit

Patrick Ruffini's avatar
Patrick Ruffini
Sep 18, 2026
∙ Paid

No. 416 | September 18, 2026

🧯 The case against AI doom

The capabilities of AI systems are growing by the week. I personally am experiencing it. Many of the AI workflows I’ve jerry-rigged virtually since the introduction of ChatGPT have just started working in the last few weeks. To me, that’s an unalloyed good. AI makes this a great time to be alive.

The flip side of AI models growing more capable is that there are growing examples of models “going rogue” and behaving in unexpected ways: the Hugging Face attack, models changing their instructions, AI models being used to test-engineer rockets for Houthi militias.

Living in the shadow of p(doom), artwork by ChatGPT

I’m an unreconstructed tech enthusiast who was similarly giddy about the early Internet but also mindful of the reckoning that followed.

Despite that early optimism, the Internet couldn’t solve for the bad behavior of the people using it. Make the Internet broadly available and you get cyberattacks and bot swarms. You also get t…

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Patrick Ruffini.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Patrick Ruffini · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture